Did Jay Glazer report the Marvin Harrison Jr. trade story?

The Marvin Harrison Jr. trade report was not attributed to Jay Glazer in the provided NFL.com context.
Who was credited with the report?
NFL.com attributed the information to NFL Network Insider Ian Rapoport and ESPN’s Adam Schefter.
The context specifically says the report was not Jay Glazer.
What the report said
NFL.com reported that the Arizona Cardinals were finalizing a trade involving wide receiver Marvin Harrison Jr. The acquiring team was not identified in the source, though the Houston Texans were described as having held trade talks.
What to keep in mind
Trade reporting can move quickly. If you are checking attribution or the destination team, use the latest official report rather than assuming the situation stayed the same.
Why was Marvin Harrison Jr. expected to be inactive against the Lions?

Marvin Harrison Jr. was expected to be inactive for the Cardinals’ game against the Detroit Lions because a trade was being completed.
The reported reason
NFL.com reported that Harrison was expected to be inactive for Arizona’s Sunday game against the Detroit Lions while the Cardinals finalized a trade involving him.
What was still unclear
The report did not identify the acquiring team. It did say the Houston Texans had held trade talks, and that ESPN reported the Indianapolis Colts were not part of the trade talks.
Check the latest roster news
Because inactive lists and trades can update close to game time, confirm with the latest Cardinals or NFL reporting before treating the status as final.
What were the Cardinals reportedly seeking in a Marvin Harrison Jr. trade?

The Cardinals’ reported asking point for a Marvin Harrison Jr. trade centered on draft compensation.
Reported trade compensation
NFL.com said Arizona had been looking for:
- A second-round pick
- Additional compensation
The report did not give a full final trade package or name the team acquiring Harrison.
Teams mentioned in the report
The Houston Texans were described as having held trade talks. NFL.com also reported that ESPN said the Indianapolis Colts were not involved in the talks.
What is not settled from this report
The source described what the Cardinals had been seeking, not a completed package. For the final terms, check the latest official reporting once the deal is completed.
Sources / Learn more
Related reading
- Which players did PFF list as possible NFL trade candidates before the 2026 deadline?; Could Marvin Harrison Jr. be traded before the 2026 NFL deadline?; Why might the Titans trade Tony Pollard or Calvin Ridley?
- How often has Marvin Harrison Jr. had a low-target game over his last eight outings, and what does that pattern mean for his role in the Cardinals offense?
- What, if anything, are the Cardinals planning to change to get Marvin Harrison Jr. more involved after his low Week 1 target count?

Leave a Reply