[Beauty Revealed]: Beauty Revealed: Self-Portrait and Provenance

Artistic photo of a smiling blonde woman with blurred foreground, captured in São Paulo.

Why is Beauty Revealed generally accepted as a self-portrait?

Artistic photo of a smiling blonde woman with blurred foreground, captured in São Paulo.

Beauty Revealed is generally accepted as a self-portrait, but the available context gives only a limited basis for that conclusion.

What is confirmed

The work is an 1828 watercolor miniature on ivory by Sarah Goodridge. It is generally accepted as a self-portrait and was made when Goodridge was forty.

The image shows only bare breasts framed by white fabric. It focuses on the body from the collarbone to just below the breasts, leaving the sitter otherwise anonymous.

Why the question is unusual

Unlike a typical portrait, the image does not show a face. The sitter is anonymous within the composition, which is part of why the self-portrait identification matters.

The context confirms the accepted view, but it does not provide a detailed argument or documentary proof explaining exactly why scholars accept it as Goodridge herself.

What to check for more detail

For a fuller explanation of the attribution, look for museum catalog notes or scholarship connected to the work, since the provided context confirms the accepted identification but does not unpack all the evidence.

How did Beauty Revealed pass from Sarah Goodridge to the Metropolitan Museum of Art?

Close-up of a woman's eye gazing through torn colored paper, creating a mysterious effect.

The confirmed ownership path for Beauty Revealed runs from Sarah Goodridge to Daniel Webster, then through Webster’s family before the work entered the art market and later the Met.

The confirmed provenance timeline

Step What happened
Sarah Goodridge Goodridge made the 1828 watercolor miniature on ivory.
Daniel Webster Goodridge gave the painting to Webster, who had often sat for her and may have been romantically involved with her.
Webster’s family The work remained with Webster’s family.
Christie’s, 1981 It was sold at Christie’s in 1981.
Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2006 It later entered the Met in 2006.

What is not confirmed here

The context does not give the sale price, the buyer at Christie’s, or every ownership transfer between 1981 and 2006. It only confirms the broad path from Goodridge to Webster, Webster’s family, Christie’s, and the Metropolitan Museum of Art.

Sources / Learn more

Related reading

Comments

Leave a Reply

[privacy-do-not-sell-link]

Discover more from Trending Issues Daily

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading