What would change for investment advisers if the SEC rescinds the political contribution rule?
If the SEC rescinds the investment adviser political contribution rule, the change described in the proposal would remove that rule’s two-year compensation restriction and related recordkeeping obligations.
What would change
The current rule bars advisers from receiving compensation for advisory work with a government client for two years after certain political contributions.
The proposal would rescind that rule. The supplied context also says the related recordkeeping obligations would be removed with it.
What would not go away
The proposal says other Advisers Act obligations would remain. The supplied context specifically names:
- Antifraud provisions
- Fiduciary duties
- Compliance requirements
- Code of ethics rules
So the proposal is not described as removing all adviser conduct obligations.
Why the SEC proposed the change
The SEC said the rule has had unintended effects since its 2010 adoption, including some advisers limiting state and local political donations.
The agency also said advisers view the rule as hard to administer and as creating practical strict-liability risk for small mistakes or minor contributions.
Because this is a proposal, check the SEC’s official materials for the latest status before treating the rescission as final.
How should advisers assess political donations while the rescission is only proposed?
While the rescission is only proposed, advisers should treat the issue as unresolved based on the supplied SEC context.
The practical answer
The SEC announced a proposal, not a final rescission. The supplied context does not say the rule has already been removed.
That means advisers should review the proposal carefully and continue paying attention to existing obligations until the SEC’s official status changes.
What obligations still matter
The proposal says other Advisers Act obligations would remain in place, including antifraud provisions, fiduciary duties, compliance requirements, and code of ethics rules.
So even if the political contribution rule were rescinded, the supplied context does not support assuming political donation decisions would have no compliance relevance.
Why advisers are watching this
The SEC said the rule has produced unintended effects since 2010 and that advisers view it as difficult to administer. It also cited concerns about practical strict-liability risk for small mistakes or minor contributions.
For current compliance decisions, check the latest SEC release or official rulemaking materials because the status of a proposal can change.
Sources / Learn more
Related reading
- What would change if the SEC rescinds Rule 14a-8?; What proxy-rule proposals did the SEC announce alongside the Rule 14a-8 rescission proposal?
- What should investors do if they invested with Ernest Ossei Boateng or one of the New Jersey-based companies named in the SEC complaint?; What is the timeline of the SEC’s allegations against Ernest Ossei Boateng?; How much money did the SEC say Ernest Ossei Boateng raised from investors?; What changes would the SEC’s proposed Regulation Crypto Assets make for certain crypto asset investment contracts?
Leave a Reply